Campbell is another influencer helping to set the public down gently. The study pointed out a glaring problem in the lack of collection of data and reporting of the harms caused by masking. No harm no foul right?
Creeps that pushed this stuff should be fishing masks out of the ocean on a damn chain gang for the rest of their lives based on the harm they caused to people's immune systems, the environment, and most importantly the development of our children. Everyone who ran these agencies, scientific publications, and politicians should all be made to grab a net and scoop a mask sun up to sun down. Call it a green initiative.
I pointed out from the beginning the lack of red biohazard bins anywhere. If we were supposed to be wearing masks to protect from a deadly virus, why was there no concern about where the masks ended up?
As for the "doctor", I personally don't trust those who are allowed to remain on YouTube very much. I was pointing out the abstract of the study more than anything. Of course no "study" is going to change what I know to be true from experience on the streets. This one just happens to mostly fall in line with what I've already seen. Minus the "no harm" part. I personally believe wearing a petri dish over your face does plenty of harm. Not to mention psychological damage. I just can't quantify the damage done. Good to see you #6! Thanks for stopping in :-).
That's the point. It was obvious from BEFORE the beginning. The focus of the email isn't the retired doctor. It's the study. For those who need that kind of thing. Personally we never used masks to prevent transmission of anything prior to 2020. It's mainly a splash shield to protect our mucous membranes during calls that involve child birth, spurting wounds, etc. Thanks for your comments though ;-).
Campbell is another influencer helping to set the public down gently. The study pointed out a glaring problem in the lack of collection of data and reporting of the harms caused by masking. No harm no foul right?
Creeps that pushed this stuff should be fishing masks out of the ocean on a damn chain gang for the rest of their lives based on the harm they caused to people's immune systems, the environment, and most importantly the development of our children. Everyone who ran these agencies, scientific publications, and politicians should all be made to grab a net and scoop a mask sun up to sun down. Call it a green initiative.
I pointed out from the beginning the lack of red biohazard bins anywhere. If we were supposed to be wearing masks to protect from a deadly virus, why was there no concern about where the masks ended up?
As for the "doctor", I personally don't trust those who are allowed to remain on YouTube very much. I was pointing out the abstract of the study more than anything. Of course no "study" is going to change what I know to be true from experience on the streets. This one just happens to mostly fall in line with what I've already seen. Minus the "no harm" part. I personally believe wearing a petri dish over your face does plenty of harm. Not to mention psychological damage. I just can't quantify the damage done. Good to see you #6! Thanks for stopping in :-).
That's the point. It was obvious from BEFORE the beginning. The focus of the email isn't the retired doctor. It's the study. For those who need that kind of thing. Personally we never used masks to prevent transmission of anything prior to 2020. It's mainly a splash shield to protect our mucous membranes during calls that involve child birth, spurting wounds, etc. Thanks for your comments though ;-).